|
Multiphonic Sourcebooks by Robert Dick
Fingerings are available for well over 2,000 multiphonics (count 'em!). You can find them in several basic sourcebooks.
THE OTHER FLUTE: A PERFORMANCE MANUAL OF CONTEMPORARY TECHNIQUES (2nd
edition), by Robert Dick, Multiple Breath Music, 1989
THE AVANT-GARDE FLUTIST, by Thomas Howell, University of California Press, 1974
PRESENT DAY FLUTES, by Pierre-Yves Arteaud and Gérard Geay, Editions
Jobert, 1980
These books are listed in order of usefulness and accuracy. Yes, I'm aware
I put mine first. That's because in the 25 years since its first edition
appeared in 1975, more successful music has been created by more composers
of more stylistic proclivities than has been created from the other two
works combined. By successful, I mean simply that the music works the way
the composer intended it to. That the notes written on the page are indeed
the notes that sound. I'm also happy to report that the International
Conference in New Musical Notation (I believe in 1979 but am not absolutely
sure of the date) adopted most of my notations as standard. One of the
ongoing problems with contemporary works is the plethora of notations for
the same sound and the use of different systems to notate fingerings. Its
natural, of course, that unification is a process that takes time -- it
took several centuries for standard notation to settle into its form and
its going to take a few more decades for the notations of extended
techniques to do the same.
The three books above are all "dictionaries" of sound, describing pitch and
timbre with varying approaches to notation. It is awkward to write about
one's own work and to compare it to others'. But that's the situation and
I will give my objective best. Here are some capsule descriptions:
ARTAUD and GEAY use a system of semitones, the normal chromatic scale, with
little arrows to indicate "a little higher" or "a little lower" than the
written pitch. This typifies the vagueness that plagues this book. There
just is not enough information. The notations do not come close enough to
the sound for the player to be reasonably certain s/he is playing what is
asked for, or for the composer to internally hear the sounds so as to be
able to create with them. The authors say it best: "To draw up tables of
a satisfactory precision would demand much more time and work on our part".
Unlike Howell, whose effort and committment were massive, these guys appear
to have been thinking about their lunch.
DICK, like Howell, made a committment to try to define the flute's
resources in as complete and accurate a way as possible. I used a
quartertone scale as the basic framework since it relates to the chromatic
scale we all know and can hear easily. From the quartertone, single and
double arrows are used to define pitches that are slightly higher or lower
(single arrow) or almost a quartertone higher or lower (double arrow).
There are microtones as fine as the thirtysecnd tone (16 steps per half
step) given in the "mircotonal segments" chart. My multiphonics charts are
considered the most accurate of any out there, and the fingering diagram
system I created is by far the easiest to read. It does take up more space
than a system using numbers for fingers and/or keys, but it does not
require a mental translation to use. The player can look at the diagram
and instantly know what to do.
B) Accuracy. Whatever the notation, the information has to be accurate,
and Howell's multiphonic charts are not even close to what actually comes
out when his fingerings are played. Considering the amount of work he did,
this completely mystifies, but it is the case. Howell's book comes with a
little floppy 33r.p.m. record and on it he plays no multiphonics at all.
This baffling omission also prevents us from decoding how his personal
playing effected the production of multiphonics. I made it a point to have
other flutists test the material in THE OTHER FLUTE, so it was not just
based on any one person's playing.
C) A second edition. In the fourteen years between the 1975 and 1989
editions of THE OTHER FLUTE, incredible leaps of knowledge had been made
about how multiphonics work. Also, the body of experience accumulated from
composers working with the book made clear what needed improvement, what
had proved important, and what had proved unimportant. The rapid evolution
of electronics made it clear that a chapter on electronic modification of
the flute made no sense at all in a reference book. Its a subject for an
ongoing series of articles. Thus, making a second edition to update this
work was the logical thing to do. Comparing the two editions (the first
edition was published by Oxford University Press, New York, 1975) is also
an interesting journey into the evolution of contemporary flute playing.
While Howell was defensive, I was hopeful. In the 1989 edition, the tone
is far more assured. Hope, it seems, backed up with decades of fully
committed work, has won the day.
|